Court Community and Collaboration: Ends and Means, A Discussion Paper

Court and Community Collaboration:
Ends and Means, A Discussion Paper
(Excerpted for the original document prepared by the authors
as part of its Community-Focused Court Development Initiative)
by David B. Rottman, Pamela Casey, and Hillery Efkeman
February, 1998

< back Footnotes
1 Revision of a statement by Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson of Wisconsin, quoted in National Center for State Courts and the American Judicature Society, Improving Court and Community Collaboration: A National Town Hall Meeting, Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts, 1995.
2 Susan Daicoff, 'Lawyer, know thyself: a review of empirical research on attorney attributes bearing on professionalism,' The American University Law Review 46, 5 June, 1997: 1337-1427
3 See Gwen Griffith, 'Courts and Communities as Collaborative Venturers,' a paper prepared for the First Executive Session on Court and Community Collaboration, November 8, 1997, p. 21.
4 David B. Wexler &Bruce J. Winick, Law in a Therapeutic Key, xvii (1996)
5 conflict between a 'rights' orientation and an 'ethic of care' orientation is a source of psychological distress and low job satisfaction for many attorneys: 'humanistic, people-oriented individuals are the least satisfied lawyers; (Daicoff, 1997: 1412).